Q11 W-Seminar BAK
Here, you will find useful further information such as links and suggestions for secondary literature. Please consult the site regularly since you will constantly find updates. Furthermore, if you've come across websites, books, essays etc. that you consider useful for others too, you may share them here as well.
Links
Definition Comedy (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Filmsprache (technical terms in English)
App for free download: The Language of Film
Secondary Literature
Carroll, Noel: Humour. A very short introduction. Oxford 2014.
Fox, Kate: Watching the English. The hidden rules of English behaviour. London 2004.
Irwin, William et. al. eds. The Simpsons and Philosophy. The D'oh! of Homer. Peru, Ill. 2001.
How to find my topic
Purpose of the project paper
You need to show that you are able to deal with primary and secondary sources so that you can answer a central question and/or give arguments for your thesis. That does NOT mean that it's enough to just use secondary literature, throw in a couple of quotes from your film or book and Bob's your uncle. You have to draw your own conclucions (albeit at a rather small scale) and prove them with the help of your primary and secondary sources.
Choosing the primary source
Remember the PPT I showed you in our first session? All the topics I mentioned can be used for your paper.
General advice: Don't choose your favourite book/film/series! It will not be your favourite after you've written the paper.
Possible advantages of fiction: quite easy to deal with, you know how to analyse fictional texts, probably fairly easy to find secondary literature as long as you choose a classic
Possible disadvantages of fiction: esp. if you choose an older or more complex work, it might be challenging to fully grasp its content, "too much" secondary literature to choose from
Possible advantages of films/series: might be easier to understand, more elements to analyse (dialogues, camera, sound, lighting etc.)
Possible disadvantages of films/series: combination of several layers of perception might make analysis more challenging, greater difficulty to find secondary literature esp. if you choose a very recent or underground or mainstream series/film
Narrowing down the topic
Let's say you've decided to write about "The Simpsons". A topic like "Humor in The Simpsons" would definitely go way beyond the scope of your paper.
Limit the range of your topic:
- You could focus on one character and how comedy is conveyed through him, e. g. Crusty the Clown or Bart.
- Narrowing it even more down, you can choose a certain type of joke and the implications this has, e. g. Bart's poking fun on others
- You can link your research on one topic/character to a literary theory (e. g. about gender) or a theory of humour, e. g. Bart Simspon and the superiority theory.
- You can also focus on stereotypes and why the audience finds them funny, e. g. the portrayal of ethnic minorities
- When you write about a TV series, you need to pick a handful of episodes to prove your thesis, don't choose more than five, better less.
What exactly am I going to write about?
Don't just sum up the content of your book/film/series. That's a) boring and b) absolutely not the purpose of your project paper. There are two possible ways of making sure that you can follow your train of thought without losing the recurrent theme ("roter Faden"):
- Ask a central question that you're going to answer in your paper
- State a thesis that you're going to prove in your paper
How to create an eye-catching title
Make sure your title is eye-catching! You can include a pun or a quote or pose a provoking question.
e. g. Bart - Matt Groening's Leviathan? The character of Bart Simpson and Thomas Hobbes' superiority theory. (This is a good title because it shows that you know who or what the Leviathan is and it also links Bart to this famous book by Hobbes from the year 1651. It also poses a rather provoking question to which the reader will not automatically have an answer.)
Of course, you can choose a run-of-the-mill-title like The character of Bart Simpson. As you might see for yourself, this title is not bad, it's just VERY boring...
